In the Age of Screens (Part III)
Over the course of this week, we’ll be serializing an essay I wrote for the recent Non-Fiction Conference that took place in Amsterdam a couple weeks ago. If you’d rather not wait until Friday to read the whole thing, then click here and download a PDF version of the whole thing. Or you can click here to see all the posts.
Since I鈥檓 old and way too jacked into the literary scene to stand back from it and observe, I asked a bunch of my students a series of questions about the reading habits. I wanted to get a sense of what a reader as reader does. We (as publishers and people involved in the culture business) love to talk about being 鈥渞eader-centric,鈥 but we mean this in the aggregate. Readers as in thousands of them. What do they do? What do they buy? But when you narrow this down to a single person, all the findings of behavioral economics and neuroscience as related to decision making starts to come into play. Which could open up some interesting paths of thought.
The kids I talked to were recent grads and kids in grad school鈥攖he same people I think would be interested in Open Letter books, in 鈥渓iterature.鈥 Well. First off, they read next to no book reviews. Not one of them ever bought a book based on a Twitter recommendation. Instead they rely upon word-of-mouth and serendipity. Each of them has a handful of 鈥渂ook friends鈥 whose recommendations can tip the scales and cause them to actually seek out a particular book. Aside from that, they browse . . . they find the misfiled title (the 鈥楪鈥 author mistakenly placed among the 鈥楾鈥檚), they occasionally Google their favorite authors to see if there鈥檚 something new available. They return to old patterns鈥攆avorite authors鈥攁nd see what those people recommend. Overarching theme: they rely on people and chance.
This totally worked in the age of cluttered small bookshops with idiosyncratic collections and more eccentric owners. I was a bookstore brat. I memorized fiction sections and talked to the guys with the cardigans and tattoos who had read way more than I had. I took recommendations. I fell in love with bookstore girls. I remember losing my innocence when I entered a Waldenbooks and had the epiphany that there鈥檚 nothing special here. I remember my first experience of Barnes & Noble鈥檚 sterility. I remember the moment when I talked to a book buyer and realized that the pattern-shifting books just weren鈥檛 viable 鈥渇or a store of our size.鈥 I remember deciding that I had to get into publishing.
That moment has passed. Never again will a small-town Midwestern kid have the opportunity to peruse a hand-picked selection of literary fiction鈥攐ne that might not appeal to the masses, but is dripping in cache and the cool of smartness. This is an exaggeration, clearly, but Saginaw, Michigan kids who end up interested in strange art will rely on Amazon.com鈥攁t least for the foreseeable future.
(There鈥檚 a larger story here . . . Unique, readerly bookstores are going to suffer a dark ages in the majority of America. Historically, the chain stores and then the online retailers destroyed a huge number of these outlets. And ebook sales have further eroded their margins, leaving small, nondescript stores the will never survive by selling the books their readers鈥攚ho only want to read the entertainment everyone else is reading鈥攚ant to buy, since those same readers can buy the same thing for less online or at a chain. The stores that will survive in the long run are the one that set themselves apart in terms of knowledge and content. And those stores can only exist in readerly cities and metropolises.)
Online Discovery Moment #3: One day I noticed that Tosh Berman, a bookseller at Book Soup in L.A., had given Albert Cossery鈥檚 A Splendid Conspiracy five stars on GoodReads. Having run the Best Translated Book Award for years, and having dedicated my life to the literature beyond our borders, I felt like I should know this author. But no. No recognition at all. I marked A Splendid Conspiracy 鈥渢o read鈥 on GoodReads (and Facebook). The next day, I checked my home computer and Jeff Waxman, a bookseller from Chicago, had given Albert Cossery鈥檚 The Jokers five stars on GoodReads. Weird, no? So I marked that 鈥渢o read鈥 on GoodReads/Facebook and took my kids to forest by my house to run around and whatnot. Now, I鈥檓 a pretty unattentive parent, so as my kids did flips off the 鈥渞amps鈥 in the woods and threw dirt at each other, I checked my iPhone for new messages. What I found: My friend Brad had seen my Cossery-related GoodReads/Facebook notices and copied part of Cossery鈥檚 Wikipedia bio onto my facebook wall. Cossery was a special sort of Egyptian/French writer who believed in 鈥渓aziness.鈥 A professional author, he wrote 8 books over 60+ years. Basically, he sounded awesome. I scooped up my kids鈥攚ho were, literally, throwing clots of dirt at each other at the time鈥攄rove to Barnes & Noble, bought A Splendid Conspiracy, read it that night, and told at least 20 other people about his genius. Including a pair of girls in a local bar where I read the ending . . . They were both into books, into finding the weird, and he sounded right up their alley. So I loaned them my copy, which they hopefully enjoyed as much as I did.

Leave a Reply