{"id":470812,"date":"2021-03-03T12:00:30","date_gmt":"2021-03-03T17:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/newscenter\/?p=470812"},"modified":"2021-03-09T11:21:10","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T16:21:10","slug":"campaign-finance-reform-will-not-restore-trust-in-democracy-say-political-scientists-470812","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/newscenter\/campaign-finance-reform-will-not-restore-trust-in-democracy-say-political-scientists-470812\/","title":{"rendered":"Campaign finance reform will not restore trust in democracy, say two social scientists"},"content":{"rendered":"
Listening to science is paramount in policy making, argues David Primo<\/a>, the Ani and Mark Gabrellian Professor and a professor of political science<\/a> and business administration at the Ä¢¹½´«Ã½<\/a> in an op-ed for Roll Call<\/em><\/a>, which coincides with Congress\u2019s taking up HR 1<\/a>, the For the People Act of 2021.<\/p>\n The bill contains elements of campaign finance reform, including stricter disclosure requirements, and a call for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court\u2019s Citizens United<\/em> decision. Yet, the proposed legislation is \u201criddled with claims that do not hold up when subjected to scientific scrutiny,\u201d argues Primo.<\/p>\n Together with Jeffrey Milyo<\/a>, a professor of economics and chair of the economics department at the University of Missouri, with whom Primo cowrote a recent book, Campaign Finance and American Democracy: What the Public Really Thinks and Why it Matters<\/a><\/em> (University of Chicago Press, 2020), the researchers take issue with the underlying premises that the legislation would \u201cfortify our democracy\u201d against the \u201ctorrent of money flowing into our political system,\u201d thereby protecting \u201cthe integrity of democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n Instead they point to their own examination of data on attitudes toward money in politics. Their 2020 study showed, they write in the op-ed, \u201cforty years of experimentation with campaign finance reform and virtually no evidence that it actually improves how Americans view their democracy. And decades of social science research on democracy suggests there is no reason to believe that campaign finance reforms, which are themselves the products of a democratic process, are going to improve that process in meaningful ways,\u201d Milyo and Primo write.<\/p>\n