Octavia<\/em>?<\/p>\nOctavia<\/em>, a play ripped from the headlines in the year AD 62, was formerly attributed to the Roman philosopher Seneca, and Schmoll notes that scholars now widely agree that he did not write it. Chronicling the dissolution of the marriage between Nero, the emperor of Rome, and Octavia, his popular wife, the author of the play clearly had a working knowledge of Seneca\u2019s other tragedies, in Schmoll\u2019s view.<\/p>\nWhat should audiences expect when they come to see the production?<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\nWhen they hear it\u2019s a Roman tragedy, they might yawn and decide to go to a movie, but this production is far from that. The [set] design is not fusty or old. The characters are of the age of the student actors, so we tap into this youthful energy.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s a chorus of citizens who are supporters of Octavia, and then there\u2019s this other chorus that\u2019s pro-Nero. There\u2019s a moment where the characters are called to action and called to protest in a way that they haven\u2019t before. This resonates with the way that many people are being called to activism today. There\u2019s also a resonance in how we\u2019re conducting ourselves on the planet. There is this long passage about the natural world and how over history men that once lived in harmony with the natural world now rape and pillage it; the concern that man\u2019s behavior affects the natural world feels, of course, very contemporary.<\/p>\nKen Rus Schmoll is pictured with, from left to right, Yuki Nakase, lighting designer; Katie Farrell, program administrator; and Marsha Ginsberg, set and costume designer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat makes <\/em><\/strong>Octavia unlike other plays? <\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\nIt\u2019s so seldom done, if ever. I had no agenda with this play other than to investigate it, and understand how it works. The structure of Octavia<\/em> is different from Seneca\u2019s tragedies \u2013 it\u2019s not as violent and it\u2019s more self-aware \u2013 and aspects of it feel a little more Greek than Roman. It feels a little postmodern in its structure – the first three scenes could happen simultaneously, for example.<\/p>\nKen Rus Schmoll working with Eric Nolting ’21, the production’s A\/V engineer.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat\u2019s it like to work with Rochester students? <\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\nThey are all super smart. I was struck by how easily these students could articulate an argument. In some way, that\u2019s half the battle when grappling with a play like this one with long speeches, where people are arguing many points. It seems that whether or not these students have studied rhetoric, they know how to think critically, and they are primed for handling these kinds of arguments. It\u2019s been incredibly fun working with them.<\/p>\nKen Rus Schmoll on set with Nakase and Sam Okinow ’20,\u00a0assistant master electrician.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nHow do you like Rochester? <\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\nI love it. I\u2019m a total small-city person. I grew up outside of Hartford, Connecticut, and it feels similar. Most of my time has been spent working on the play, but I have gone running along the river and went up to Lake Ontario on my day off. It was beautiful. I love how you can drive out for five minutes and you\u2019re in farm land, which is unlike Hartford.<\/p>\n