{"id":17072,"date":"2024-12-21T12:16:37","date_gmt":"2024-12-21T17:16:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/college\/ugresearch\/jur\/?page_id=17072"},"modified":"2025-01-09T11:25:49","modified_gmt":"2025-01-09T16:25:49","slug":"where-do-we-put-saint-thecla-an-examination-of-saint-theclas-place-in-time-theology-and-femininity","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/college\/ugresearch\/jur\/where-do-we-put-saint-thecla-an-examination-of-saint-theclas-place-in-time-theology-and-femininity\/","title":{"rendered":"Where Do We Put Saint Thecla?: An Examination of Saint Thecla\u2019s Place in Time, Theology, and Femininity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Acts of Thecla<\/em>, from The Apocryphal Acts of The Apostles<\/em>, is a text about the life and martyrdom of Thecla, an early Christian figure and the first female martyr (second only to Stephen). The author, an anonymous presbyter from Asia Minor, wrote this text in the apostolic style in the second century alongside Acts of Paul<\/em>. The two texts were often grouped together as the Acts of Paul and Thecla<\/em>, though Thecla\u2019s section was much more popular, while Acts of Paul<\/em> gradually disappeared in Late Antiquity.<\/p>\n

Around the same period, a second text, a collection of twenty-eight chapters on Thecla\u2019s life, appeared in Seleucia, the home of Thecla\u2019s shrine, cult, and adulthood. Known as the Life of Thecla<\/em> and written somewhere between 444 and 448 AD, the fifth-century text is much longer and based directly on the Acts<\/em>.While initially attributed to Archbishop Basil of Seleucia, this assumption has been debunked due to internal textual evidence [1]<\/sup><\/a>. Both the Acts and the Life portray Thecla as a devout virgin who, inspired by the teachings of the Apostle Paul, embarks on a faith-filled journey. Along the way, she defends her chastity, survives near-executions, and famously performs an act of self-baptism. Although these texts share thematic elements, these texts differ significantly in cultural perspective, religious ideology, and dramatic flair. They both (but more significantly Acts<\/em>) are the subject of fierce debate between scholars of female piety and apostolic texts, usually over the origin of the narrative and the radical nature of Thecla. Thecla was certainly radical and feminine, and she faced her share of male pious critics over the ages. However, we cannot assign to her story a total rebellion of patriarchal piety, as her texts survived (in some respect or another) every era of masculine hierarchy. A comparison of the two texts, Acts<\/em> and Life,<\/em> allows for further insight into this thin line that Thecla tows into late antique society.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Acts of Thecla<\/em> (translated by J. K. Elliot [2]<\/sup><\/a>) closely mirrors the scriptural style of the New Testament, a point that has generated significant controversy. The scriptural composition style garnered the negative attention of the theologian Tertullian (160-240 AD), as Thecla\u2019s feminine ability to baptize is given (in his opinion, unfounded) validity by her apostolic portrayal. More modern scholars further argue that the historical and theological accuracy of the text is not consistent with apostolic and first-century Christianity, contrasting the writing style. Naturally, these theologians resent the implication that Thecla originated at the time of the Apostles (1st Century). The fifth-century text, Life of Thecla<\/em>, however, does classify Thecla as an Apostle (as well as a martyr)[3]<\/sup><\/a>. This argument over the possibility of a female Apostle no doubt holds serious weight for feminist scholars and theologians, as well as for the Catholic church that canonized Thecla.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Life of Thecla<\/em> is certainly not in the scriptural style. It uniquely embellishes lofty and dramatic speeches and monologues of the characters, both pious and pagan, and is the first half of a broader text by the same author, Life and Miracles of Thecla<\/em>. Miracles<\/em> portrays Thecla\u2019s miracles (mostly in life and surrounding healing, some posthumous) in Seleucia, where her cult and shrine were located in the 5th Century, but is not fully explored in this analysis. This particular English translation by Andrew S. Jacobs is based upon the French translation from Greek by Gilbert Dagron and covers only Life<\/em>. The differences between the two original texts, Acts<\/em> (from the 2nd Century), and Life<\/em> (from the 5th Century), can be largely accounted for by the difference in cultural and generational perspective, especially considering the large cult already amassed by Saint Thecla in the town where the authorship of Life<\/em> took place.<\/p>\n

Though both follow a certain glorifying and romantic pattern of adventure (which some scholars argue is Hellenistic and unchristian due to the abundance of earthly rewards), Life<\/em> is lengthy enough to include the drama of interpersonal relationships. The text is littered with personal laments about Thecla\u2019s aesthetics and her decision to remain chaste, such as characters exclaiming over her beauty or giving dramatic and self-important speeches. Thecla\u2019s mother began a public speech with the words, \u201cHear of this calamity from someone who doesn\u2019t want to speak of it!\u201d [4]<\/sup><\/a> with all the narrative drama of a layman\u2019s work of fiction. These speeches often give (arguably too much) characterization and reason to the opposers of Thecla and Christianity that were not there in the 2nd Century text. Perhaps the author uses these arguments to highlight and comment on the debates more relevant to fifth-century Seleucia. A particularly compelling case for resurrection through marriage rather than chastity is expressed by a town leader in Life<\/em>, as he states, \u201cthe true and accurate \u2018resurrection\u2019 is preserved and accomplished every day in human nature itself: for the succession of children born from us is what exists and is desired, with the image of those sowing and reproducing being renewed again in their children, and so in this way \u2018resurrecting,\u2019 such that we seem to see those who long ago passed away in the living people who are once more with us\u201d. [5]<\/sup><\/a> This is uniquely eloquent, especially for a character branded as an enemy of Christianity in a religious text. This is not an isolated example in 5th Century Life<\/em>, but there are no examples of such developed debates in the 2nd Century Acts<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Acts<\/em> does, however, afford Thecla a more clear and autonomous Baptism, which is the heart of much of the scholarly debate and radical sentiment surrounding Acts<\/em>. Acts<\/em>\u2019s Thecla states clearly, after surviving multiple beasts (and harnessing a Lioness) and before jumping into a pit of \u201csavage seals\u201d [6]<\/sup><\/a>, \u201cIn the name of Christ I baptize myself on my last day.\u201d [7]<\/sup><\/a> This baptism is not preceded by the permission of the Apostle Paul; she baptizes with full autonomy from all but Christ. The 5th Century text Life <\/em>[8]<\/sup><\/a>, however, does require such permission, which leads many to believe that Thecla had more religious autonomy in the original Acts<\/em>. The baptism in Life<\/em> is still somewhat autonomous and transpired under similar circumstances, with Thecla stating, \u201cresolve this fear for me through baptism of death\u201d [9]<\/sup><\/a>. This version gives less power to the secular, antemortem self, and has more suicidal undertones. This certainly aligns with the antiquitous and medieval move into a pious rejection of the body out of ultimate respect for the spirit.<\/p>\n

Whether or not this scene grants Thecla the power to baptize others<\/em> after surviving this attempt is another matter of debate surrounding both texts, and usually comes down to differences in translation from ancient Greek. In any case, these differences illuminate the stark and aggressive controversies in a few scholarly questions. When and how did the story of Thecla originate? Was Thecla an Apostle? Was she an example of the possibility of radical femininity in Christian piety, or just a submissive follower of a masculine religion with exemplary chastity?<\/p>\n

The first question, of when and how the story of Thecla came to be, is not nearly as straightforward as one might hope. Of course, Acts<\/em> came first, and its writer was deposed in the latter second century. But some scholars, such as Stephen Davis, argue that the text was a written account of an earlier oral history, passed down by women. [10]<\/sup><\/a> Evidence for this, beyond the story\u2019s female protagonist and working knowledge of female struggle (marriage, sexual assault, travel), lies a particular chastizement in the Old Testament that some believe is a direct attack on Thecla (which would imply her existence in the original world of Christianity and apostles). The tendencies of patriarchal New Testament texts to chastise gossip and \u201cold wive\u2019s tales\u201d [11]<\/sup><\/a> had, according to J.K. Elliot, substantial evidence implying a reference to the Thecla specifically. Several recent scholars, such as Lynne C. Broughton and Esther Yue Lo Ng, deny this claim of oral sources and pre-2nd Century origin (and many other popular claims about Acts<\/em>) with fervor. Broughton goes so far as to claim that most of Thecla\u2019s scholarly concern is riddled with \u201cCatholic affiliation and feminist concerns,\u201d [12]<\/sup><\/a> and states that claims attributing Thecla to early apostolic texts or assigning her religious accolades are full of \u201cself-fulfilling hypotheses and questionable selection of evidence\u201d [13]<\/sup><\/a>. Broughton suggests that specific moral elements of Acts<\/em> (the earlier text) are direct misalignments with the Hebrew teachings that ruled scripture during the time of the apostles [14]<\/sup><\/a>, and the scriptural composition of the text is \u201cdangerous\u201d [15]<\/sup><\/a> for that reason. Lo Ng\u2019s analysis aligns with Broughton\u2019s and adds further evidence to her claims against the apostolic classification of Thecla. She adds locational inaccuracies regarding a \u201c1st Century\u201d character in Acts<\/em>, the Queen Tryphaena [16]<\/sup><\/a>. Lo Ng spends most of her analysis on the defensive against scholars like Stephen Davis and D. R. MacDonald. She specifically attacks the latter on their claim that Thecla was \u201cinitially accepted as scripture until its pro-woman stance was seen as heretical by a patriarchal church\u201d [17]<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

D. R. MacDonald\u2019s claim may not have enough evidence to hold such a lofty implication. However, Broughton and Lo Ng\u2019s classification of Acts<\/em> as \u201canti-scriptural\u201d in content, and Thecla as too undereducated to be an apostle [18]<\/sup><\/a> are ignorant of a couple of important points (one of which is illuminated by the 5th Century text, Life<\/em>). The first, which Broughton weakly acknowledges, is the possibility that certain pieces of apostolic evidence were naturally or intentionally stifled by the years of patriarchal clergy and record-keeping. This would not be an implausible or isolated situation if it were the case. The second, which neither analyses confront, is far more relevant in my opinion. The fifth-century text, Life<\/em>, outright classifies Thecla as an Apostle. In this text, it is said by the (quite revered and influential) apostle Paul, directly to Thecla, \u201cApostles, among whom also you will be numbered,\u201d in a manner which I am sure is not light-hearted. [19]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The extent to which Saint Thecla represents the radically feminine in Christianity goes beyond (though is very much intertwined with) her status as an Apostle. The controversial idea was that her story was not only about<\/em> women but also by<\/em> women through oral tradition. It furthers Thecla\u2019s message of autonomy and creates another example of female authorship in scripture\/hagiography. This theory that the tale of Thecla was originally an oral history, by and for<\/em> women, is championed by Dr. Stephen Davis. While the by<\/em> is highly contested, there is reasonable evidence that the story of Thecla was for <\/em>women. Acts<\/em>, the original text, was just a short part of the much larger text, Acts of Paul and Thecla<\/em>. According to Davis, this implies that Thecla was for a specifically female audience [20]<\/sup><\/a>. To expand upon this, I would offer that the success of Acts of Thecla<\/em> compared to the lengthy irrelevancy and disappearance of Acts of Paul<\/em> suggests that the particular style and thematic content of the author\u2019s texts were better received by women than men. For Acts of Thecla<\/em> in particular, the adventurous and autonomous Thecla represents the literary and scriptural rarity of a charismatic feminine leader. Not only is Thecla feminine, but her story accurately represents a few uniquely female struggles surrounding early Christian faith and late Antique culture.<\/p>\n

Thecla (in both Acts <\/em>and Life<\/em>) was subjected to pressure from a legally binding marriage proposal to a Pagan man, as well as social obligations to procreate for her town. Throughout this pressure, Thecla derived her faith from a male Apostle, rebelling against her mother and local government by deciding to keep her virginity, rather than simply save it for her future husband. The complexity of this social and religious pressure would not resonate well with male crowds.<\/p>\n

Such is true for Thecla\u2019s trials in Antioch, as she is faced with an attempted rape by a socially powerful man and leans on the support of a female community to retain her chastity. An older woman and a gossiping female chorus support Thecla, while Paul simply flees the situation [21]<\/sup><\/a>. There is evidence that the author of Life<\/em> is aware of the success of this story amongst women, as this latter text (which was authored by a theologian who would have been well aware of Thecla\u2019s female cult) depicts a more intense description of the sexual assault. The earlier text, Acts<\/em>, simply states that the man \u201cembraced her in the street\u201d [22]<\/sup><\/a>, while Life<\/em> describes the man \u201centwining himself with her and feverishly pushing against her\u201d [23]<\/sup><\/a>. In the latter text, Thecla responds with a defiant and courageous speech and physically humiliates the man, and the survival of her subsequent execution by beasts leads the women of the town to follow Thecla socially and in her faith in God. This happens (albeit less dramatically) in the earlier text as well, omitting the speech. In the words of Stephen Davis, \u201csuch charismatic figures do not typically subsist on their own\u2026they tend to exist in symbiosis with settled communities that offer subsistence and material support\u201d [24]<\/sup><\/a>. Among the women in support of Thecla is Trypheana, a queen who recently lost her daughter, and took immediate responsibility for the young Thecla because of it. This is yet another example of the uniquely feminine thematic elements in the story of Thecla.<\/p>\n

Conversely, Lo Ng claims that the story of Thecla is not explicitly empowered by gender and is instead meant to \u201cdemonstrate the power of God to the helpless\u201d [25]<\/sup><\/a>. This \u201chelplessness\u201d could be based upon Thecla\u2019s subjection to execution (multiple times), and the unlikely resilience of the young virgin. However, if this were the intention, Thecla would be a flawed example of the helpless. Her wealth and ability to travel safely (although she did have to dress like a man for protection) would hinder this theme, as would her reliance on other women, as well as God, for mercy. Another issue with this claim that Thecla\u2019s helplessness was more central than her femininity is the success of her cult, which was dominated by monastic women<\/em> at her shrine, Hagia Thecla<\/em> [26]<\/sup><\/a>. There were many pilgrimages to this shrine, most notably by the female pilgrim Elgeria in the 4th Century. There is certainly a gendered element to Thecla\u2019s appeal beyond \u201chelplessness\u201d.<\/p>\n

Life,<\/em> the fifth-century text, was authored in the same town as Hagia Thecla<\/em>, and the author most likely used their insight to shape and alter the story of Thecla from the original Acts<\/em>. This shrine was located in Seleucia (in modern-day Turkey), and centralized the cave where the text claimed that \u201cstill living, she [Thecla] sank and entered secretly into the earth\u201d [27]<\/sup><\/a>. This strange fate for the mortal Thecla (being absorbed by rock) is unprecedented but may have had a motive. With intimate knowledge of Hagia Thecla<\/em> and the culture surrounding it, the author of Life<\/em> explains the lack of relics or bones in the cave [28]<\/sup><\/a>. Another, slightly humorous, display of the author\u2019s social locality to Hagia Thecla <\/em>is his snarky remark about who Thecla belongs to. The author states that Thecla traveled in Syrian <\/em>Antioch, and not<\/em> Pisidian Antioch, \u201ceven if the Pisidians should wish it!\u201d [29]<\/sup><\/a>. It seems that the author\u2019s insight into the area and cult in Seleucia also modifies key details in his depiction of Thecla. These modifications create yet another scholarly debate: the fifth-century author\u2019s alleged \u201cdomestication\u201d of Saint Thecla [30]<\/sup><\/a>. It is believed that the latter text tones down Thecla\u2019s original power and subversion, especially because of the differences in the baptism scene.<\/p>\n

In response to the idea that the fifth-century text \u201cdomesticates\u201d the Thecla of the original text, Susan E. Hylan represents the opposition. In her analysis, the fifth-century text may even radicalize her. Hylan does not believe that Thecla\u2019s self-baptism is toned down, and she asserts that fifth-century Life<\/em> assigns Thecla more modes of power (such as ultimate forgiveness of sin and baptism of others). This would imply that the audience in fifth-century Seleucia would relate to female power, as the text \u201cexpects that readers will not be surprised by a woman undertaking such actions\u201d [31]<\/sup><\/a>. From Thecla\u2019s agency and the author\u2019s classification of Thecla as a martyr and an apostle, the fifth-century Thecla is not \u201cdomesticated\u201d or watered down. Unfortunately, the analysis that this insinuates an egalitarian culture or faith does not account for certain crucial factors.<\/p>\n

There are over fifteen examples throughout the fifth-century Life<\/em> of the author asserting in great detail the subservient and diminished role of women, either directly or through a character, in words that were not<\/em> present in the original text. Not only this, but he attributes some of Thecla\u2019s power to her adherence to these roles. To account for Thecla\u2019s silence in court (which was attributed to her attraction to Paul in the original text), the author states that there is, to a woman, \u201cnothing so fitting as silence and keeping quiet\u201d [32]<\/sup><\/a>. These remarks are interspersed with Thecla\u2019s radical and powerful actions, some of which directly attributed her power to Paul, rather than herself, in ways not considered by 2nd Century Acts<\/em>. Paul was, overall, a much stronger character in the fifth-century text, and is given an almost prophetic role, as he warns Thecla of her future trials \u201cthrough fire and beasts\u201d [33]<\/sup><\/a>, long before the events of her martyrdom transpire. Once again, this detail was not present in Acts<\/em>. Davis accounts for this disparity, stating that \u201cthe work portrays a cult that is strongly patronized by women, and yet at the same time gripped by elements of patriarchal bias\u201d [34]<\/sup><\/a>. It is possible, however, that these changes are a little more deliberate than simply products of their time. Perhaps the author meant to channel Thecla\u2019s power for an agenda rather than diminish it.<\/p>\n

Life<\/em> contains more elements of explanation and religious instruction than the scriptural bluntness of the second-century text. Usually through Paul, the author instructs chastity, arguing in favor of marriage (though also of virginity), and often touches on points completely irrelevant to the narrative of Thecla, or the spirit of Acts<\/em>. In a long monologue, Paul speaks on matters such as the \u201csecond coming of Christ\u201d [35]<\/sup><\/a>. It would not be far-fetched to assume that the author wanted this text to instruct Thecla\u2019s unruly cult and other Christian monastics and laymans. This is revealed quite directly in Life<\/em>, as the governor of a town within the narrative exclaims at Thecla\u2019s female popularity; \u201cshe taught the women among us not to consider anything more honorable than temperance!\u201d [36]<\/sup><\/a>. In the story, Thecla was a tool for the governor to tame the women of his town. Perhaps the author of Life<\/em> meant to do the same for his retelling of Thecla.<\/p>\n

The entire story of Saint Thecla, as portrayed in both Acts of Thecla<\/em> and Life of Thecla<\/em> is a romantic adventure, often criticized for its deviation from the expected monotony and humility of monastic life and scripture. Yet, Thecla remains a woman revered for her chastity and her martyrdom (though she is said to have survived both execution attempts). The total classification of Thecla as a martyr, apostle, Saint, or heretic is a heavy and treacherous scholarly liability. Perhaps this is because of the tendency of the original hagiographers to differ and embellish. A certain fourth-century account of Thecla by Eusebius mentions her so briefly that she only has time to die a martyr\u2019s death accompanied by two men, which is a complete deviation from all other accounts. Acts<\/em> portrayed her as an Apostle and Life<\/em> used this status for political and religious messaging. Modern scholars sort through Thecla\u2019s texts without agreeing upon their context. Now, the Catholic Church largely ignores this Saint and original Martyr. Perhaps it is so difficult to fit Thecla somewhere simply because she does not fit anywhere, and miraculously existed unto herself in Seleucia into and beyond Late Antiquity. Still, the differences between the origin of the cult, Acts of Thecla<\/em>, and the text influenced by it, Life of Thecla<\/em>, assist the scholar in her burden of classification of the radically autonomous Saint Thecla.<\/p>\n

Works Cited <\/u><\/p>\n