蘑菇传媒

logo

Dubravka Ugresic and Jessa Crispin

Kirkus just a longish interview by Jessa Crispin (founder/editor of ) with Dubravka Ugresic about her new collection, (Which, not to give too much away, is one of the books on my “Best of 2011” list that Tom and I will be discussing on this week’s podcast.)

You should and read the whole piece (after which, you’ll head over to your retailer of choice and buy a copy of the book), but for those of you still here, here’s a few choice excerpts:

What’s your relationship to pop culture? Detached observer? Or do you have the last season of The Good Wife on DVD?

Popular culture (or moreover, its products) doesn鈥檛 interest me so much. What interests me is cultural populism. In other words, I鈥檓 not interested in the saga of the Twilight books and movies, but in the mechanism of fascination these products instill in millions of young consumers.

The patterns of popular culture have permeated every sphere of our lives, our entire mental landscape: politics, relationships, the education system, language, our narratives, trends, fashions, art and literature. Popular culture has even penetrated scholarly enclaves. That鈥檚 why it鈥檚 impossible to talk about popular culture, because it鈥檚 a very particular cultural reservation; popular culture is more like the air we breathe, and that鈥檚 why participation in it is so hard to escape.

Much of the Karaoke Culture you write about contains this impulse to remove the viewer from reality as much as possible, or to dunk them as fully into a new world as possible. From the intense fandom sites that put you in the world of the object of your affection, whether that be a vampire book or a television show, to something like Second Life. Is it something about contemporary life that drives this, or are humans always looking for the exit ramp?

Popular culture and cultural populism work two ways. Popular culture is a carrier of 鈥渙ld truths,鈥 myth-like structures, and in this respect it鈥檚 always retrograde. But it鈥檚 also highly topical, engaged and relevant, because it works as a mirror. It reflects the obsessions, fears, dilemmas and frustrations of many people, transforming them into a pleasure zone, into our contemporary myths, into screens for our projections. Today鈥檚 popular culture boasts tremendous power because its consumers are no longer passive: thanks to technology, s/he is an inter/active participant. Technology gives the consumer a strong sense of communality and the power to change things. Whether it鈥檚 just a psychological trap, whether one really can change things or not, that鈥檚 another question. [. . .]

You write at one point that the reason we don’t have children anymore, referring to the increased rates of violence amongst youths, is because we don’t have adults anymore. Certainly there is little difference in the culture we consume鈥攅very generation is listening to the same music, watching the same television shows, playing the same video games. Is there something stunting about a culture that tells us we can all pursue our dreams rather than deal with dreary obligations, and when pleasure is only a few clicks away?

We do live in infantile times, mothers increasingly look like their daughters, and they, mothers and daughters, both behave like little girls. Fathers compete with their sons. We all try to stay young until we die. Nobody wants to be lumped in the 鈥渙ld jerks鈥 category anymore. That鈥檚 why the world, or the richest and 鈥渓uckiest鈥 part of it, resembles a kindergarten.

Popular culture, TV shows, movies, books, games, the Internet, media, technology鈥攖hese are our favorite toys. Vladimir Putin miserably singing 鈥淏lueberry Hill,鈥 accompanied by the best American musicians and applauded by the best American actors, is one of the most grotesque recent images of life in our kindergarten.

However, I write my essays not to preach and moralize, though that鈥檚 unavoidable, too, but to see what鈥檚 behind the curtain, how the mechanism works. One of my dearest books was, and still is, The Wizard of Oz. And my favorite literary hero is not Dorothy, or her three companions, but Toto, a little dog. He鈥檚 the one who pulls the curtain, not because he鈥檚 brave, but simply because he鈥檚 curious.



Comments are closed.